Search for: All records

Abstract Plankton form the foundation of marine food webs, playing fundamental roles in mediating trophic transfer and the movement of organic matter. Increasing ocean temperatures have been documented to drive evolution of plankton, resulting in changes to metabolic traits that can affect trophic transfer. Despite this, there are few direct tests of the effects of such evolution on predator–prey interactions. Here, we used two thermally adapted strains of the marine mixotroph (organism that combines both heterotrophy and autotrophy to obtain energy) Ochromonas as prey and the generalist dinoflagellate predator Oxyrrhis marina to quantify how evolved traits of mixotrophs to hot and cold temperatures affects trophic transfer. Evolution to hot temperatures reduced the overall ingestion rates of both mixotroph strains, consequently weakening predator–prey interactions. We found variability in prey palatability and predator performance with prey thermal adaptation and between strains. Further, we quantified how ambient temperature affects predator grazing on mixotrophs thermally adapted to the same conditions. Increasing ambient temperatures led to increased ingestion rates but declines in clearance rates. Our results for individual, pairwise trophic interactions show how climate change can alter the dynamics of planktonic food webs with implications for carbon cycling in upper ocean ecosystems. 

Abstract As chloroplast‐stealing or “kleptoplastidic” lineages become more reliant on stolen machinery, they also tend to become more specialized on the prey from which they acquire this machinery. For example, the ciliateMesodinium rubrumobtains > 95% of its carbon from photosynthesis, and specializes on plastids from theTeleaulaxclade of cryptophytes. However,M. rubrumis sometimes observed in nature containing plastids from other cryptophyte species. Here, we report on substantial ingestion of the blue‐green cryptophyteHemiselmis pacificabyM. rubrum, leading to organelle retention and transient increases inM. rubrum's growth rate. However, microscopy data suggest thatH. pacificaorganelles do not experience the same rearrangement and integration asTeleaulax amphioxeia's. We measuredM. rubrum's functional response, quantified the magnitude and duration of growth benefits, and estimated kleptoplastid photosynthetic rates. Our results suggest that a lack of discrimination betweenH. pacificaand the preferred preyT. amphioxeia(perhaps due to similarities in cryptophyte size and swimming behavior) may result inH. pacificaingestion Thus, while blue‐green cryptophytes may represent a negligible prey source in natural environments, they may helpM. rubrumsurvive whenTeleaulaxare unavailable. Furthermore, these results represent a useful tool for manipulatingM. rubrum's cell biology and photophysiology. 

Abstract Mixotrophic protists combine photosynthesis and phagotrophy to obtain energy and nutrients. Because mixotrophs can act as either primary producers or consumers, they have a complex role in marine food webs and biogeochemical cycles. Many mixotrophs are also phenotypically plastic and can adjust their metabolic investments in response to resource availability. Thus, a single species's ecological role may vary with environmental conditions. Here, we quantified how light and food availability impacted the growth rates, energy acquisition rates, and metabolic investment strategies of eight strains of the mixotrophic chrysophyte,Ochromonas. All eightOchromonasstrains photoacclimated by decreasing chlorophyll content as light intensity increased. Some strains were obligate phototrophs that required light for growth, while other strains showed stronger metabolic responses to prey availability. When prey availability was high, all eight strains exhibited accelerated growth rates and decreased their investments in both photosynthesis and phagotrophy. Photosynthesis and phagotrophy generally produced additive benefits: In low‐prey environments,Ochromonasgrowth rates increased to maximum, light‐saturated rates with increasing light but increased further with the addition of abundant bacterial prey. The additive benefits observed between photosynthesis and phagotrophy inOchromonassuggest that the two metabolic modes provide nonsubstitutable resources, which may explain why a tradeoff between phagotrophic and phototrophic investments emerged in some but not all strains.